PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > PCB Footprint Expert > Questions & Answers
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why do footprint names indicate transistor vs IC?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Why do footprint names indicate transistor vs IC?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
adevries View Drop Down
Active User
Active User


Joined: 06 Dec 2019
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote adevries Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why do footprint names indicate transistor vs IC?
    Posted: 22 Sep 2020 at 5:52pm
Hello,

I've been looking through the Library Expert Pro 2020 software, as well as the Land Pattern Naming Convention, and I noticed that some footprints make a distinction when it comes to the function of the part. For example, there is no generic small outline flat lead (SOFL) footprint. If the part is an IC, the name starts with "ICSOFL", if the part is a transistor, the name instead starts with "TRXSOFL". Why does the name change depending on the function of the part? By following this convention, if I have an IC and a transistor in identical SOFL packages, they would map to different footprints. Is this ever a desirable situation? Why not just group all SOFL packages under the name "SOFL"?

I have the same question about "TRXDFN" vs "SON"

Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5239
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Sep 2020 at 8:37am
The Footprint and the 3D STEP model are the same naming convention. 

The 3D model could have different color body, terminals, polarity marker. 

Stay connected - follow us! Twitter - LinkedIn
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.