PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > PCB Footprint Expert > Product Suggestions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
 Rating: Topic Rating: 4 Votes, Average 5.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
LaserAlex View Drop Down
Active User
Active User
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Points: 27
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote LaserAlex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density
    Posted: 03 Jun 2019 at 4:39pm
I would love to see a checkbox in the export / script generation window that would generate all three footprint densities (Least, Nominal, Most) in a single output script.  This would make it much easier to provide all three footprints at once when creating a new component into Altium Designer.
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5188
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 8:18am
Would you mix L, N and M in the same PCB library?
Stay connected - follow us! Twitter - LinkedIn
Back to Top
LaserAlex View Drop Down
Active User
Active User
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Points: 27
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LaserAlex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 9:21am
Yes, I would keep them in the same library, with each schematic component pre-assigned to be able to use all three options.  That is how Altium's on-demand library parts work and I like the effect.

I start the layout with the N part for most designs, or M for high-reliability.  But if I find myself caught in board size constraints I can change parts down to L (or from M to N) in the schematic or board layout without needing to replace the schematic component with one from another library.

Of course you have more experience than a lot of us here, Tom, so if you suggest an alternate workflow I'd be happy to hear.


Back to Top
JamesHeadOI View Drop Down
Active User
Active User


Joined: 05 Sep 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JamesHeadOI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 11:57pm
Yes, I too would use such a feature though I wouldn't place it as a priority.
I always output all three, N, M and L at the same time and import into the same footprint library for Pulsonix to give me choice in designs.
I normally only use the N but in some portable instruments where space is tight I may make the decision to go down to L.
Generally I use M for those boards where there's a high likel hood that they are going to be hand-soldered as a prototype/development board or even a production board where only a handful are going to be required each year and it again is going to be hand-soldered.
Back to Top
SquareBill View Drop Down
New User
New User


Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SquareBill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 2021 at 3:48pm
I would prefer an option to generate them into separate libraries. We use Concord and all of the footprints are their own elements that can be added to a component definition. I only ever use Nominal and Least, although I wouldn't care if M were generated along with the others.
Something I would like to see would be to import sub configs into the settings so that a Flex definition for instance could be simultaneously exported along with any or all of the IPC definitions.
Back to Top
zentekfr View Drop Down
Active User
Active User


Joined: 04 Jan 2022
Status: Offline
Points: 30
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote zentekfr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2022 at 2:11am
I second this suggestion.
I always generate L and M densities in the same file for further flexibility of my future designs.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.039 seconds.