PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > PCB Footprint Expert > Questions & Answers
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How is a courtyard excess defined?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

How is a courtyard excess defined?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
klgsfglksagjas View Drop Down
New User
New User


Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klgsfglksagjas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: How is a courtyard excess defined?
    Posted: 20 Feb 2022 at 10:14am
How are the courtyards of components defined? 

If you want to pack things together as tight as possible according to the courtyards, do you align the courtyard edges together, do you align the courtyard to the body of the nearest component, or something else altogether?

Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5239
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Feb 2022 at 11:33am
IPC introduced the placement courtyard excess and the manufacturing allowance. 

However, IPC has not updated their guidance on this land pattern feature in over 12 years. Especially for microminiature packages and high-density PCB design layouts. 

We adopted IPC-7351 for both the mathematical model for pad stack and courtyard calculations, but a lot has changed in the past 12 years. 

One of the changes should be the elimination of Fabrication and Assembly Tolerances in the mathematical model. Also, updating and changing all negative solder joint goals to 0.00 as the negative values were applied to compensate for the robust Fabrication and Assembly Tolerances. 

The placement courtyard is also evolving and becoming smaller due to assembly placement accuracy. But the courtyard excess is also used for component rework area to allow room for extraction tools, cleaning and replacing defective components. 

The question should be "I'm designing a PCB prototype and is there a requirement for rework?" If not, you can reduce the placement courtyard size. If you do plan on rework, then the package height is a big concern as rework tools need space to extract the component. 

The last IPC-7351B released in 2010 defines the 3-Tier courtyard sizes for Least 0.10, Nominal, 0.25 and Most 0.50. But we found that the nominal density can easily handle a 0.20 courtyard excess and Most density a 0.40 courtyard excess. These have been the default values in Footprint Expert for several years now with no one complaining. 

The part placement should allow the courtyard outline to bump up against each other and not overlap. 


 
Stay connected - follow us! Twitter - LinkedIn
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.