DFN and PSON footprint differences

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Hi Tom and Team,
When I am creating footprints I have as a rule of thumb, to use rounded rectangle pads except for DFN, LGA, PQFN and Thermal pads. For this footprints I use rectangle pads

What about PSON? I think that this footprint has the pads underneath the body as a DFN and It should use a rectangle pad, as well.

What is the default recommendation for this footprint type?

Regards,
david

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
dramos Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Advanced User Joined: 18 Feb 2021 Status: Offline Points: 81	Post Options Post Reply Quote dramos Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: DFN and PSON footprint differences Posted: 16 Jun 2025 at 11:10pm
	Hi Tom and Team, When I am creating footprints I have as a rule of thumb, to use rounded rectangle pads except for DFN, LGA, PQFN and Thermal pads. For this footprints I use rectangle pads What about PSON? I think that this footprint has the pads underneath the body as a DFN and It should use a rectangle pad, as well. What is the default recommendation for this footprint type? Regards, david



Tom H Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5940	Post Options Post Reply Quote Tom H Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 17 Jun 2025 at 7:13am
	PSON is the same as PQFN as both have Pull-Back leads under the package body. PSON/PQFN terminal leads come is 2 shapes. Rectangular Lead = Rectangular Pad D-Shaped Lead = Rounded Rectangle Pad LGAs have 2 terminal lead shapes. Square Lead - Square Pad Round Lead = Round Pad DFNs have rectangular leads Thermal Terminal Leads come in 2 shapes. Rectangular Rounded Rectangular
	Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn

dramos Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Advanced User Joined: 18 Feb 2021 Status: Offline Points: 81	Post Options Post Reply Quote dramos Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 17 Jun 2025 at 10:33pm
	Hi, Many thanks for the explanation! I am working on the Calculator Option File, and I would like to share with you one idea. When we are configuring the default Pin1 orientation, Pad shape... In the Components-Surface Mount , Would be very crazy - no sense idea - to separate into two different options the QFN and PQFN. SON and PSON is another example. The reason is the next, if we have a PQFN component with rectangular leads of course we will use a rectangular pad, but if we have a QFN footprint with a rectangular lead perhaps would be interesting to use a rounded rectangle pad. uploads/15739/example1_2025-06-17_22-32-35.png Thanks for your comments. Best regards, david

Tom H Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5940	Post Options Post Reply Quote Tom H Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 18 Jun 2025 at 9:01am
	Is this a New Feature Request? If so, you're in the wrong Forum Thread. Go here - https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/product-suggestions_forum33.html The component families are grouped together for easy code changes.
	Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn

dramos Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Advanced User Joined: 18 Feb 2021 Status: Offline Points: 81	Post Options Post Reply Quote dramos Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 18 Jun 2025 at 2:59pm
	Hi, It was not a Feature Request at the beginning of all... But as I realized that the Option configuration could create confusion between the users, YES I will add it as Request improvement of the program. Best regards, david