PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Libraries > Footprints / Land Patterns
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - DFN and PSON footprint differences
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

DFN and PSON footprint differences

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
dramos View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 18 Feb 2021
Status: Offline
Points: 67
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dramos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: DFN and PSON footprint differences
    Posted: 16 Jun 2025 at 11:10pm
Hi Tom and Team,

When I am creating footprints I have as a rule of thumb, to use rounded rectangle pads except for DFN, LGA, PQFN and Thermal pads. For this footprints I use rectangle pads

What about PSON? I think that this footprint has the pads underneath the body as a DFN and It should use a rectangle pad, as well.

What is the default recommendation for this footprint type?

Regards,
david
Back to Top
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5796
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 hours 54 minutes ago at 7:13am
PSON is the same as PQFN as both have Pull-Back leads under the package body. 

PSON/PQFN terminal leads come is 2 shapes. 
  1. Rectangular Lead = Rectangular Pad
  2. D-Shaped Lead = Rounded Rectangle Pad
LGAs have 2 terminal lead shapes. 
  1. Square Lead - Square Pad
  2. Round Lead = Round Pad
DFNs have rectangular leads

Thermal Terminal Leads come in 2 shapes.
  1. Rectangular 
  2. Rounded Rectangular 

Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn
Back to Top
dramos View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 18 Feb 2021
Status: Offline
Points: 67
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dramos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 1 hour 34 minutes ago at 10:33pm
Hi,

Many thanks for the explanation! 

I am working on the Calculator Option File, and I would like to share with you one idea.
When we are configuring the default Pin1 orientation, Pad shape... In the Components-Surface Mount , Would be very crazy - no sense idea - to separate into two different options the QFN and PQFN. SON and PSON is another example.

The reason is the next, if we have a PQFN component with rectangular leads of course we will use a rectangular pad, but if we have a QFN footprint with a rectangular lead perhaps would be interesting to use a rounded rectangle pad.

Thanks for your comments.

Best regards,
david

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.