|
|
Through-hole Naming Convention Suffix? |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
Tom H 
Admin Group 
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Online Points: 5857 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Through-hole Naming Convention Suffix?Posted: 5 hours 10 minutes ago at 8:17am |
|
Also, when a Surface Mount footprint uses the Mfr. Recommended Pattern or the footprint is non-standard, there is no Density Level for these footprints as they are the mfr. recommended patterns.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom H
Admin Group
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Online Points: 5857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 5 hours 18 minutes ago at 8:09am |
|
The 3-Tier library system only pertains to Surface Mount footprints.
 There is only 1-Tier for through-hole and we refer to it as 'Proportional' pad stacks where the pad diameter is 1.5 times the hole diameter.  |
|
|
|
|
m.elsayed
Advanced User 
Joined: 22 Sep 2016 Status: Offline Points: 54 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 hours 11 minutes ago at 12:16am |
|
I noticed Through-hole Naming Convention doesn't contain an N suffix.
However Surface Mount contains the suffix 'N' when using Nominal Density Level in Options.
Can you explain this point? |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options