PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Libraries > Schematic Symbols
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Alignment pins/Mounting holes
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Alignment pins/Mounting holes

 Post Reply Post Reply
dlveazie View Drop Down
New User
New User

Joined: 17 Mar 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dlveazie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Alignment pins/Mounting holes
    Posted: 10 Apr 2017 at 12:13pm
I'm curious if there are any guidelines for symbols and footprints for parts (typically connectors) with alignment and/or mounting pins.

Firstly the symbol. Advised to show all? Only copper features? None? Seems wrong to not use any because more than likely they'll go to GND.

For the footprint, abbreviations (that obviously match symbol if shown) for these types of pins. AP? MH? WT? SHLD? 

Obviously there is no "one way" but if there are any suggestions, I'd like to hear them. I'm new to the librarian role and appreciate all the experienced opinions before me.

MH for mounting hole just feels like a screw hole. I like AP# for non-copper alignment pins and WT# for weld tabs but that's only because that's what Samtec calls them.
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4180
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Sep 2017 at 5:31pm
There are no global standards on connector symbols, footprints or 3D models.. 

You should create your own guidelines and adhere to them. 

Stay connected - follow us! Twitter - LinkedIn
Back to Top
Matthew Lamkin View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User

Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 284
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matthew Lamkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Sep 2017 at 2:03am
I would add any hole that has a connection to it into the schematic, as a mapped pin within the library part. This would usually be a separate symbol if there are many of these, so that they can be moved to a corner of the schematic rather than clog up the main drawing area.

You can usually do this like a multi gate device is done in a library part.
There is no need to add alignment pins into the schematic, if it's not electrically connected - it does not "need" to be shown, unless there are overriding reasons for it being shown.

They have the same reference name as the main symbol, otherwise it confuses the reader - so do not use anything else. It is after all the same part.

I did this so that when checking the PCB for faults etc. the person doing this is fully informed of what is connected and what is not.

Otherwise they have to guess and assume and we know what trouble this causes :)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.