PCB Libraries Forum : Max Height in Footprint Naming Convention https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ Sun, 05 Apr 2026 20:29:22 +0000 Sun, 14 Sep 2025 08:43:46 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3537 <![CDATA[PCB Libraries Forum]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/forum_images/PCBLForumLogo.gif https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ <![CDATA[Max Height in Footprint Naming Convention : The Max Height is intended for...]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/max-height-in-footprint-naming-convention_topic3537_post14025.html#14025 Author: Tom H
Subject: 3537
Posted: 14 Sep 2025 at 8:43am

The Max Height is intended for the 3D STEP model. 

The majority or Footprint Expert users have the 3D STEP feature and all of them requested Max Height. 

We deliver what the electronics industry wants. 

We're sorry that we didn't mention this in the IPC-7351 publication. 

]]> Sun, 14 Sep 2025 08:43:46 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/max-height-in-footprint-naming-convention_topic3537_post14025.html#14025 <![CDATA[Max Height in Footprint Naming Convention : I have noticed the footprint naming...]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/max-height-in-footprint-naming-convention_topic3537_post14019.html#14019 Author: m.elsayed
Subject: 3537
Posted: 14 Sep 2025 at 12:00am

I have noticed the footprint naming convention uses the max height. 

However this not mentioned  in document "IPC-7351B & IPC-7352 Footprint Naming Convention"

Example:
BGA27C100P3X9_900X300X143 

Please add more details


]]> Sun, 14 Sep 2025 00:00:13 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/max-height-in-footprint-naming-convention_topic3537_post14019.html#14019