<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Pin in Paste</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Pin in Paste]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 20:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 04:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3208</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Pin in Paste : Would it be possible to implement...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post13764.html#13764</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17440">felecro</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3208<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28 Jan 2025 at 4:54am<br /><br />Would it be possible to implement this kind of calculation for PiP mask in the future revisions of Footprint Expert?<br><br><a href="https://software.indium.com/stencil-coach/pin-in-paste-apertures.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://software.indium.com/stencil-coach/pin-in-paste-apertures.php</a><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 04:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post13764.html#13764</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Pin in Paste : There is a feature in Footprint...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12769.html#12769</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3208<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13 Jan 2023 at 10:35am<br /><br />There is a feature in Footprint Expert called "Incremental Pad Stack" in which the pad size annular ring gets bigger an bigger depending on the terminal lead size.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>The calculation is - Pad Size is 1.5X of the hole size.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>1 mm hole = 1.5 mm pad (0.25 annular ring)</div><div>2 mm hole = 3.0 mm pad (0.50 annular ring)</div><div>3 mm hole = 4.5 mm pad (0.75 annular ring)</div><div>4 mm hole = 6.0 mm pad (1.00 annular ring)&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>The hole size is calculated from the max. lead diameter.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>So the 1.1 scale paste mask over pad size should be adequate, but I see Samtec connectors call out large paste mask sizes in their datasheets.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 10:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12769.html#12769</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Pin in Paste : There is not a Pin-in-Paste calculator...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12768.html#12768</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3208<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13 Jan 2023 at 9:38am<br /><br />There is not a Pin-in-Paste calculator as there is no guidance from any world standards group like IPC.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>When I see a Pin-in-Paste in the mfr. recommended pattern, they normally call out the paste mask size.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>If you have a known calculator for Pin-in-Paste technology, please send it to us.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 09:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12768.html#12768</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Pin in Paste : Hi Tom,I know we have had the...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12766.html#12766</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=15164">phil.holden</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3208<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13 Jan 2023 at 2:55am<br /><br />Hi Tom,<br><br>I know we have had the ability to include the paste mask in through-hole footprints. I was wondering whether there was an actual calculator for getting the hole-to-lead ratio correct for the purpose of PIP technology?&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 02:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12766.html#12766</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Pin in Paste : Pin-in-Paste has been a feature...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12764.html#12764</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3208<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 Jan 2023 at 9:44am<br /><br />Pin-in-Paste has been a feature in Footprint Expert from the first release.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><b>Tools &gt; Options &gt; Console &gt; Generate Through-hole Paste Mask&nbsp;</b></div><div><br></div><div>This will add paste mask to all through-hole footprints.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>You can turn it on to create an entire library with Pin-in-Paste technology using your existing FPX file library.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>You can add a Density Level (Suffix) modifier to identify the footprints that have Paste Mask. I recommend "<b>P</b>" or "PIP". Use the "<b>Overwrite Footprint Name Suffix</b>" option right above the "Generate Through-hole Paste Mask" button.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12764.html#12764</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Pin in Paste : Are there any plans for inclusion...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12763.html#12763</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=15164">phil.holden</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3208<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 Jan 2023 at 8:09am<br /><br />Are there any plans for inclusion of a 'Pin in Paste' hole size calculator? Or does anybody have any credible information regarding making this calculation.&nbsp;<br><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/pin-in-paste_topic3208_post12763.html#12763</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>