<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Double Segment Polarity Mark</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Double Segment Polarity Mark]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 06:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=251</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Double Segment Polarity Mark :   We have decided that on many...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/double-segment-polarity-mark_topic251_post2086.html#2086</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 251<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22 Oct 2012 at 9:59am<br /><br />We have decided that on many component families there is no room for double silkscreen outlines for Polarity Marking. <div>&nbsp;</div><div>Instead, the new standard is the "Lack of Silkscreen" is the new polarity marker. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Can you look at this QFN picture with the physical component installed&nbsp;and tell me where Pin 1 is? </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><img src="uploads/3/QFN_Polarity_Marking.png" height="219" width="266" border="0" /></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Nice solution for bottom only terminal parts and micro-miniature packages.</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/double-segment-polarity-mark_topic251_post2086.html#2086</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Double Segment Polarity Mark :  If there is room, add a short...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/double-segment-polarity-mark_topic251_post605.html#605</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10">RLS2004</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 251<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29 May 2012 at 5:48pm<br /><br />If there is room, add a short ss segment to improve visibility of the pin 1 polarity. <div>&nbsp;</div>EG for DIOSC95P205x160x80-4N&nbsp; Place a short silkscreen line segment, the length of pin 1, just above the upper silkscreen line by pin 1 (like a double line).]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 17:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/double-segment-polarity-mark_topic251_post605.html#605</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>