<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : IPC-7251</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : IPC-7251]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:44:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1798</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[IPC-7251 : Library Expert only uses &amp;#034;Hole...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7370.html#7370</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1798<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Nov 2015 at 10:44am<br /><br />Library Expert only uses "Hole Over Lead" from IPC. Everything else uses the PTH Reference Calculator located here - <font size="2"><p><a href="http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-smd-pth-reference-calculators_topic785.html%20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-smd-pth-reference-calculators_topic785.html </a> </p></font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7370.html#7370</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[IPC-7251 : Thanks, but I still confused on...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7366.html#7366</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11266">drj-bbe</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1798<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Nov 2015 at 12:59am<br /><br />Thanks, but I still confused on below two calculation method for a pad: <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>IPC-2221B calculation formula is: </DIV><DIV>Land size, minimum =&nbsp;<U>Hole size</U>&nbsp;+ <U>2*Min. annular ring(Min 0.05mm)</U>&nbsp;+ <U>fabrication allowance</U></DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>IPC-7351C calculation formula will be: </DIV><DIV>Pad diameter = <U>Hole size</U> + <U>2*Min. annular ring(Min 0.2mm)</U>, or = <U>Hole size</U> * <U>pad-to-hole-ratio</U>, whichever is larger.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>But&nbsp;calculated result&nbsp;will be&nbsp;different between above two calculation method, IPC-7351C defined a proportional annular ring, IPC-2221B defined same size annular ring even though&nbsp;hole size go up, right?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>This is for minimum pad design, the annular ring&nbsp;seems smaller than normal, is there suggestion for normal pad size?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7366.html#7366</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[IPC-7251 : Set all the Through-hole user...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7365.html#7365</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1798<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Nov 2015 at 8:55pm<br /><br /><div>Set all the Through-hole user preferences - </div><div><br></div><div><b>Preferences &gt; Terminals &gt; Through-hole</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div>The current default settings are from IPC-2221 but will also be in IPC-7351C. </div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7365.html#7365</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[IPC-7251 : Thank you very much. I have other...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7364.html#7364</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11266">drj-bbe</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1798<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Nov 2015 at 7:45pm<br /><br />Thank you very much. I have other questions below:<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>The calculation formula below for pad diameter is different with IPC-2221B 9.1.1, how to set "pad to hole ratio" and "minimum annular ring"?</DIV><DIV><a href="http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-smd-pth-reference-calculators_topic785.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-smd-pth-reference-calculators_topic785.html</A></DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>The calculation&nbsp;of&nbsp;pad diameter in IPC-7351C will not consider "Standard&nbsp;fabrication allowance"&nbsp;which in IPC-2221B Table 9.1, right?</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7364.html#7364</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[IPC-7251 : The IPC Land Pattern committeedecided...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7361.html#7361</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1798<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Nov 2015 at 5:48am<br /><br />The IPC Land Pattern committee&nbsp;decided a year ago to merge IPC-7251 for through-hole into the new IPC-7351C. <div><br></div><div>You can download several documents here - <a href="http://www.pcblibraries.com/downloads" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><u><font color="#0066cc">http://www.pcblibraries.com/downloads </font></u></a><br></div><ul><li>What's New in IPC-7351C</li><li>Surface Mount Component Families</li><li>Through-hole Component Families</li></ul>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7361.html#7361</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[IPC-7251 : Hi all:  I cannot find IPC-7251...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7360.html#7360</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11266">drj-bbe</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1798<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Nov 2015 at 2:33am<br /><br />Hi all:<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I cannot find IPC-7251 in IPC website, it haven't released?</DIV><DIV>What is the standard for through hole land calculation in Library Expert?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Thanks in advance.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 02:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251_topic1798_post7360.html#7360</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>