<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : IPC-7251 &amp; 3-Tier PTH Pad Stack Obsolete</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : IPC-7251 &amp; 3-Tier PTH Pad Stack Obsolete]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 20:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1463</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[IPC-7251 &amp; 3-Tier PTH Pad Stack Obsolete : In 2009 IPC (Dieter Bergman,...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251-3tier-pth-pad-stack-obsolete_topic1463_post5897.html#5897</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1463<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05 Nov 2014 at 10:13am<br /><br /><span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"><font face="Calibri" size="3">In 2009 IPC (DieterBergman, John Perry and Tom Hausherr) started progress on a land patternstandard for through-hole components called IPC-7251. There were meetings whereGary Ferrari attended by webcast. The 3-Tier pad stack annular ring forthrough-hole was based off the same precedent for SMD where the Least, Nominaland Most environments had a single value for Toe, Heel and Side. IPC-7251 nevergot published and progress was discontinued on October 1, 2014 by the IPC 1-13Land Pattern committee as they decided to instead add it to IPC-7351C whichwe’re currently working on. </font></span><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"><font face="Calibri" size="3">&nbsp;</font></span></p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"><font face="Calibri" size="3">The IPC-7251through-hole pad stack was inherently flawed due to the 3-Tier annular ringconcept that the same Annular Ring Value could be used for any hole size. Anexample of this would be: The Nominal Environment annular ring (AR) was set to8 mils. That means that a 10 mil hole had a 8 mil AR and a 20 mil hole had a 8mil AR and the 40 mil hole had a 8 mil AR and a 80 mil hole had a 8 mil AR. Theflaws are apparent in that small holes require small AR and large holes requirea larger AR for solder volume, strength, voltage current, heat, etc. Eventhough LP Wizard and Library Expert supported IPC-7251, the through-holedefault in both programs was “Proportional Pad Stacks” due to the fact thatIPC-7251 was an unreleased standard. </font></span></p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ipc7251-3tier-pth-pad-stack-obsolete_topic1463_post5897.html#5897</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>