<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Measurement Tool</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Product Suggestions : Measurement Tool]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1213</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Measurement Tool : Agreed that this would be a nice...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/measurement-tool_topic1213_post4778.html#4778</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=201">Jeff.M</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1213<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 16 Dec 2013 at 3:09pm<br /><br /><div>Agreed that this would be a nice enhancement (we’ll try to add it in the next full version update – 2014) but I’m not sure a measurement tool will enhance this particular experience.</div><div>IPC has both positive and negative recommended protrusions that are used to generate a calculated footprint.</div><div>It isn’t uncommon for a footprint to be smaller than the terminal extents in toe, heel or side dimensions. &nbsp;It depends on the terminal type, selected environment and any rules that may be applied.</div><div>To try to adjust the lead size to achieve a preconceived dimension diminishes the purpose of having a calculator.</div><div>If you want to conform to a manufacturer’s suggested footprint just use the provided option for directly entering a footprint.</div><div>For other elements you can query any shape, line or pad stack to view it's dimension.</div><div>No footprint you import into any tool should deviate from what is generated by or what you see in the calculator.</div><div>If you are finding this isn't the case please submit another post with enough specific information that would allow us to reproduce the issue.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/measurement-tool_topic1213_post4778.html#4778</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Measurement Tool :  Can you add a measurement tool...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/measurement-tool_topic1213_post4777.html#4777</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=7765">pweddle</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1213<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 16 Dec 2013 at 2:01pm<br /><br /><p>Can you add a measurement tool that would snap to center to center and from edge to edge? This would be nice to have. I am finding discrepancies between my Altium wizard import of the footprint of what it is supposed to be and what I am actually receiving.</p><p>Example:</p><p>If I build a resistor array convex (or concave)&nbsp;and I put in all the parameters. My import footprint is giving me a pad size that my normal and max pin widths&nbsp;will protrude over the edge of the pad. For the software not to do this, I am forced to insert the normal pin width and only the +tolerance. The -tolerance needs to be 0.00. This fixes the issue for me. So now, my confidence has dropped a bit in the software and I am going back to double check all of the footprints that I just made. Is this an Altuim import issue or is it a calculation thing that needs to be adjusted in the software?</p><p>The measurement tool would be great in being able to measure what is being built / calculated in the library expert vs. what I am actually getting in Altium. </p><p>Thank you,</p><p>Phil</p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/measurement-tool_topic1213_post4777.html#4777</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>