<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Last 10 Posts]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 20:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:46:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Questions &amp; Answers : How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14492.html#14492</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 Mar 2026 at 8:46am<br /><br />Here is the original EIA PDP-100 Chip Package dimensions and tolerances.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/chips_topic3598.html%20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/chips_topic3598.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>Compare with IEC.</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14492.html#14492</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Questions &amp; Answers : How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14491.html#14491</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=19482">Ariel_Levy</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 Mar 2026 at 12:58am<br /><br />Tom thank you very much&nbsp;<img src="https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /><div>and thank you&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 13px; : rgb251, 251, 253;">Feynman</span><br><div><br></div><div>My difficulty is in obtaining information the thickness of the contacts size of the component (the size "T")</div><div>I bought the IPC-7351 and 7352. and you don't have information about this.</div><div>I think to buy&nbsp;EIA-JEP95 , and don't know it's worth the money if very MFG design is contacts size what "he" want's.</div><div><br></div><div>This table i found is accurate?</div><div><img src="uploads/19482/EIA_standard.jpg" height="200" width="347" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div><div>How you handle this with&nbsp;general discrete components ,when the contacts size can be between 0.10 to 0.40?</div><div>With the IPC-7351 when contacts size is 0.4 mm?</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14491.html#14491</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Questions &amp; Answers : How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14490.html#14490</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14683">feynman</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22 Mar 2026 at 10:14am<br /><br />Ask a/your assembler. They probably assembled millions of parts and are probably the best source for a reliable footprint.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14490.html#14490</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Questions &amp; Answers : How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14489.html#14489</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22 Mar 2026 at 8:14am<br /><br />IPC-7351 uses Min/Max Mode technology. the resulting footprint takes into consideration the package tolerances to calculate the pad stacks. The solder pattern should accommodate the package in the minimum, nominal and maximum material condition.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>The average 0402 tolerance range is +/-0.05 to +/-0.10.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>It seems like component manufacturers use their nominal package dimensions and add a Toe, Heel and Side. They use Nominal Mode technology and ignore the tolerances they provide in their datasheets.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>The average dimensions on an 0402 are L=1.00, W=0.50, T=0.25.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Your pad stack pattern will depend on what dimensions and tolerances you use.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>However, if you run into a 0402 chip manufacturer that has tolerances greater than 0.10, I would highly question the accuracy of their machine process.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Ideally, manufacturers try to produce packages that are Nominal Material Condition. That's the goal. Maybe in the future package tolerances will be 0.00 and then the Nominal Mode technology will take over and the IPC-7351 mathematical model will be history.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 08:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14489.html#14489</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Questions &amp; Answers : How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14488.html#14488</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=19482">Ariel_Levy</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> How To Choose the Footprint for SMD Chip Resistor<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22 Mar 2026 at 5:07am<br /><br /><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">How do you choosethe footprint for SMD Resistor case 0402?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">Vishay have3 recommendations for footprints.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">Yageo onerecommended but it’s different from Vishay.</span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US"><b>Vishay recommendation:</b></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">L=0.50 A=0.40 B=0.60</span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US"><b>BASED ONIPC-7351</b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">L=0.40 A=0.55B=0.60</span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><b>BASED ON IEC 61188-6-2</b><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">L=0.55 A=0.35B=0.55</span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US"><b>Yageo</b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">L=0.50 A=0.50 B=0.60<o:p></o:p></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;<img src="uploads/19482/0402_footprint.jpg" height="278" width="413" border="0" /></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"="">I am very confused by all the recommendations.</p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span lang="EN-US"></span></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"="">I would appreciate a suggestion or any guidance on how to choose a footprint.</p><p ="ms&#111;normal"=""><br></p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 05:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/how-to-choose-the-footprint-for-smd-chip-resistor_topic3630_post14488.html#14488</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Standard Components : Footprint Origin Crosshair and Target Scaling]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/footprint-origin-crosshair-and-target-scaling_topic3629_post14487.html#14487</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Footprint Origin Crosshair and Target Scaling<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Mar 2026 at 11:21am<br /><br /><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in">Origin elements generally includea<i> Crosshair</i> and a <i>Target (Circle).</i>&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></p><p ="ms&#111;normal"="" style="margin-bottom:0in"></p><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in">The elements scale themselves tothe part size within user definitions, in combination with hard-coded minimumand maximum limits.&nbsp; Origin controls maybe found in the <i>Drafting Options </i>to include origin elements consist ofCrosshair, Target, both or neither.<o:p></o:p></p><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in"><img src="uploads/3/Origin_Crosshair.png" height="170" width="650" border="0" /><br></p><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in">The length of the crosshair linesare limited to a minimum of the smaller of, one half the minimum of thecourtyard length or width and not to exceed the <i>Crosshair Size</i>option.&nbsp; The <i>displayed</i> line length will be the specified linelength plus the line width.<o:p></o:p></p><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in"><img src="uploads/3/Origin_Target.png" height="200" width="347" border="0" /><br></p><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in">&nbsp;The target is scaled to maintain aconstant size relative to the crosshair and not exceed the <i>Target Diameter</i>size option.&nbsp; The <i>displayed target outside diameter</i> will be thespecified size plus the line width.</p><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in">The limits are to ensure theorigin always remains inside the footprint extents without becoming excessivelylarge or small.&nbsp;</p><p ="Ms&#111;normal" style="margin-bottom:0in"><br></p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/footprint-origin-crosshair-and-target-scaling_topic3629_post14487.html#14487</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Altium : Issue Creating New Footprint in Altium Workspace]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/issue-creating-new-footprint-in-altium-workspace_topic3628_post14486.html#14486</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=376">cioma</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Issue Creating New Footprint in Altium Workspace<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 Mar 2026 at 12:14pm<br /><br /><div>We have the same problem, I'd say this is an issue with Altium Designer, please raise a bug on their system an repost here.</div><div><br></div><div>Our workaround is importing PCBL footprint (running a script) into a local PCBLib library, making a copy of "template" footprint in A365 workspace and then manually selecting and copying all the footprint data from local&nbsp;PCBLib&nbsp;to&nbsp;A365 workspace footprint and then committing it. Don't forget to copy footprint name, description and height as well.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/issue-creating-new-footprint-in-altium-workspace_topic3628_post14486.html#14486</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Altium : Issue Creating New Footprint in Altium Workspace]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/issue-creating-new-footprint-in-altium-workspace_topic3628_post14485.html#14485</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=19409">laurence.donkers</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Issue Creating New Footprint in Altium Workspace<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 Mar 2026 at 4:45am<br /><br /><div>Hi everyone,&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>I'm having an issue when using the Footprint Expert import scripts on a newly created footprint in my company's Altium365 Workspace.</div><div><br></div><div>My current workflow is this:</div><div><ol><li>In the Altium Explorer panel, I navigate to our Footprint models folder and click <br>"(+) Add Footprint..."</li><li>This creates a new item ID (PCC-###) and opens up a new Footprint libary file based on our workspace's footprint template</li><li>I run the script generated by FPE by using File &gt; Run Script... &gt; From File etc.</li><li>The footprint is generated properly within the new Footprint library file, <b>but</b>&nbsp;when I open the PCB Library panel, the script-generated footprint is added as a separate footprint within the file.</li><li>If I try to "Save to server", I get a warning that two footprints are included in the file (since Altium workspace is set up to operate with max. one footprint per file)</li><li>Since this is a workspace footprint library file, Altium actually grays out the "Add" and "Delete" buttons in the PCB Library panel, so it can't be manually deleted.</li><li>If I choose to release as a single footprint, it actually deletes the script-generated footprint and keeps the template!</li><li>I can work around this by then opening the newly released footprint library file and repeating the generation from script and then I can save it. However this is really not ideal, since the process has to be repeated.</li></ol></div><div><br></div><div>Could the generated scripts be modified so that if it detects a workspace footprint file it replaces the currently open footprint, rather than creating a new one within the same file?&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 04:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/issue-creating-new-footprint-in-altium-workspace_topic3628_post14485.html#14485</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Questions &amp; Answers : Chip Caps and Resistor w/No Terminal Tolerance]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/chip-caps-and-resistor-w-no-terminal-tolerance_topic3627_post14482.html#14482</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Chip Caps and Resistor w/No Terminal Tolerance<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 11 Mar 2026 at 8:31am<br /><br /><div>When L and L1 dimensions are the same, only enter L (don't enter duplicate dimensions).&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>L1 is optional if it's different than L.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>I recommend that you open the free SM Discrete.fpx file and sort the Case Code Column.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Then search for similar Case Codes from other manufacturers and see what their Terminal Lead Tolerances are.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Sometimes the component manufacturer will only provide the Minimum dimension and you need to figure out the Maximum dimension.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Average Terminal Tolerances for chip components by Case Code:</div><div><ul><li>01005 - 0.03</li><li>0201 - 0.05</li><li>0402 - 0.10</li><li>0603 - 0.15</li><li>0805 - 0.20</li><li>1206 - 0.25</li><li>1812 - 0.30</li></ul><div><br></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/chip-caps-and-resistor-w-no-terminal-tolerance_topic3627_post14482.html#14482</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Questions &amp; Answers : Chip Caps and Resistor w/No Terminal Tolerance]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/chip-caps-and-resistor-w-no-terminal-tolerance_topic3627_post14480.html#14480</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=18320">pcbfreedomcad</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Chip Caps and Resistor w/No Terminal Tolerance<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 11 Mar 2026 at 5:14am<br /><br />What is entered in the tool for L and L1, when there is no tolerance for lead length given in the datasheet?&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>I am thinking of Chip Capacitor and Resistor terminal tolerances.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 05:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/chip-caps-and-resistor-w-no-terminal-tolerance_topic3627_post14480.html#14480</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>