<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 20:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1868</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls : Non-collapsing BGA balls start...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post9744.html#9744</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1868<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 10 Aug 2018 at 11:34am<br /><br />Non-collapsing BGA balls start at 0.50 mm pitch and less.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>The pad size is larger because you need to do via-in-pad and you need an annular ring.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>The solder mask swell = 0 or even -0.05 mm to solder mask define.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Even if you can use 2 mil trace/space to escape the second rows, the solder mask must always cover the trace to avoid solder bridging between trace and pad.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>A 0.50 mm pitch non-collapsing ball size average is 0.25 mm diameter with a pad of 0.33 mm diameter. This leaves a 0.17 mm gap between pads. 0.05 mm trace/space = 0.15 mm but you must consider a 0.025 mm tolerance on the solder mask registration.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/BGA_Solder_Mask_Maximum_Offset_1.png" height="180" width="254" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post9744.html#9744</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls : Hello Tom,For fine pitch BGA&amp;#039;s...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post9743.html#9743</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=5122">Eng. Jesus Mora</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1868<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 10 Aug 2018 at 10:12am<br /><br />Hello Tom,<div><br></div><div>For fine pitch BGA's using the non-collapsing ball in PCB Library expert program we always have default&nbsp;Solder mask expansion of 0 mils. Do you recommend for all fine-pitch non-collapsing ball to use 0 mils expansion? or what is your recommendation for SM expansion in these cases?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post9743.html#9743</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls : This is what a Collapsing BGA...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7826.html#7826</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1868<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 30 Jun 2016 at 7:21am<br /><br /><div>This is what a Collapsing BGA Ball looks like - </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><img src="uploads/3/BGA_Collapse.JPG" height="284" width="375" border="0" /></div><div><br></div><div>Here is a non-collapsing BGA ball with a solder mask defined pad. IPC has guidance&nbsp;to avoid this, but it's impossible for pin pitches below 0.65 mm if there are traces on the same layer.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><img src="uploads/3/BGA_No_Collapse.JPG" height="281" width="375" border="0" /></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7826.html#7826</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls :  Thank you for the clarification...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7623.html#7623</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10928">lsday</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1868<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Apr 2016 at 9:09am<br /><br />Thank you for the clarification Tom.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7623.html#7623</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls : Non-collapsing BGA&amp;#039;s normally...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7622.html#7622</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1868<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Apr 2016 at 7:44am<br /><br /><div>Non-collapsing BGA's normally are 0.50 mm pitch or less. </div><div><br></div><div>There are various Chip Scale Packages where the mfr. calls the package a BGA but instead of a Ball there is only a bump. This is also a non-collapsing BGA. </div><div><br></div><div>All other BGA's are Collapsing Balls.</div><div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7622.html#7622</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Collapsing vs: Non-Collapsing BGA Balls :  How does one know if the BGA...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7621.html#7621</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10928">lsday</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1868<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Apr 2016 at 7:37am<br /><br />How does one know if the BGA (CSP) has collapsing or non-collapsing solder balls? ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/collapsing-vs-noncollapsing-bga-balls_topic1868_post7621.html#7621</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>