<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 11:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1744</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B : Hi Tom.That was what our findings...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13791.html#13791</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=18748">KoryJohnsonTek</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 14 Feb 2025 at 11:14am<br /><br />Hi Tom.&nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>That was what our findings were/are.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>When you mentioned the knee, we were not seeing any reference in any of our datasheets for what the represents.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Maybe it was just a matter of us misunderstanding your intent, I guess.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Your Amax is in agreement with our Amax, which is the same as what IPC stated to me in a follow-up email.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you for your follow-through and patience!&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13791.html#13791</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B : Here is the original drawing from...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13776.html#13776</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Feb 2025 at 3:59pm<br /><br />Here is the original drawing from 20 years ago when we were helping IPC define the difference between Gullwing and Outward L-Bend (Mini Gullwing) terminal leads.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/Mini_Gull-Wing_&#070;ormula.JPG" height="167" width="344" border="0" /><br></div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13776.html#13776</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B : Respectfully, I would like you...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13775.html#13775</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=18748">KoryJohnsonTek</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Feb 2025 at 1:32pm<br /><br />Respectfully, I would like you to rethink the original poster's question.&nbsp; According to the IPC's note 1, an SOx part will usually always follow Note 1, and not the standard goal <b>if </b>Amax is the max lead expansion.&nbsp; Smin is calculated (in simple terms) as Lmin-(2*Tmax), and that is always going to be less that Amax - by your definition.&nbsp; What is it that we are missing?&nbsp; We understand what you are trying to say, but it seems like there is something missing somewhere, because you seem very sure of it, and we are very sure of the opposite.&nbsp; I really think that the poster's comment about this being the knee-to-knee dimension is correct, and it follows what you showed&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 13px; : rgb251, 251, 253;">05 Aug 2015 at 8:57pm.</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 13:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13775.html#13775</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B : This thread explains the difference...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13774.html#13774</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Feb 2025 at 9:23am<br /><br />This thread explains the difference between the Gullwing and Outward L-Bend terminal leads of SOT packages.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>The image that illustrates the A-Max going to the Gullwing Knee was wrong. A-Max is the dimension from Toe to Toe, (not Knee to Knee).&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/Terminal_Lead_Anatomy_2025-02-06_09-23-06.png" height="415" width="481" border="0" /><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13774.html#13774</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B : Hi Tom.I realize this thread is...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13773.html#13773</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=18748">KoryJohnsonTek</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Feb 2025 at 9:13am<br /><br />Hi Tom.&nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>I realize this thread is 10 years old, but we are just now looking at this from the IPC standard perspective and were trying to understand Amax and what it means.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>After reading this thread, we are still confused.&nbsp; Are you still saying that Amax is the maximum lead expansion that IPC calls out in their calculations?&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>It seems contrary to what we are see in the IPC formulas.&nbsp; How does your Amax have anything to do with whether the leads are bent inward?&nbsp; drj-bbe made a good point that it would seem to be related to what they showed, which you insisted it is not the case, given your second-to-last image.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>If the calculations are only about lead expansion and minimum lead length, it would seem that any calculation would always follow the exception in note 1.</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post13773.html#13773</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B :  This picture illustrates what...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7137.html#7137</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05 Aug 2015 at 8:57pm<br /><br />This picture illustrates what the IPC-7351B&nbsp;text condition for Gull Wing lead is referring to. <div>&nbsp;</div><div>When the Terminal Leads bend inward.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><img src="uploads/3/SOT23-6_3D_Model.png" height="350" width="421" border="0" /></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7137.html#7137</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B :  Sorry for the late reply especially...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7135.html#7135</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05 Aug 2015 at 8:27pm<br /><br />Sorry for the late reply especially for such a simple question, it's been really busy lately. <div>&nbsp; </div><div>Amax = the Lead Span </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><img src="uploads/3/Amax.png" height="329" width="455" border="0" /></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>3D model created by Library Expert.</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7135.html#7135</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B : I cann&amp;#039;t find dimension &amp;#034;A&amp;#034;...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7133.html#7133</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11266">drj-bbe</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 Aug 2015 at 8:11pm<br /><br />I cann't find dimension "A" mentioned above in SMD reference calculator. It&nbsp;seems only for chip component.<DIV></DIV>Could you tell me which size is for the dimension "A" ?<DIV>Thanks.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7133.html#7133</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B :  Please download the SMD Reference...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7132.html#7132</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 Aug 2015 at 7:52pm<br /><br />Please download the SMD Reference Calculator. <div>&nbsp;</div><div>All values and dimensional assignments are displayed.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>You can change the calculation&nbsp;values and observe the resulting land pattern results. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Download here -</div><div><a href="http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-smd-pth-reference-calculators_topic785.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-smd-pth-reference-calculators_topic785.html</a></div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 19:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7132.html#7132</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Dimensional Principles of IPC-7351B : I have mark Amax and Smin below,...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7131.html#7131</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11266">drj-bbe</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1744<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 Aug 2015 at 6:38pm<br /><br /><P>I have mark Amax and Smin below, is it correct?</P><DIV></DIV><DIV><img src="http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/uploads/11266/Capture2.PNG" height="206" width="346" border="0" /></DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dimensional-principles-of-ipc7351b_topic1744_post7131.html#7131</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>