<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 05:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1578</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor :  The Library Expert already produces...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6436.html#6436</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1578<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Feb 2015 at 1:31pm<br /><br />The Library Expert already produces a CAPPC footprint name. <div>&nbsp;</div><div>The Footprint Naming Convention document was updated - <a href="uploads/3/Footprint_Naming_C&#111;nventi&#111;n_-_Surface_Mount.zip" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Footprint_Naming_Convention_-_Surface_Mount.zip</a></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6436.html#6436</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor :  In which case, you may wish...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6427.html#6427</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=10706">Ian S</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1578<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Feb 2015 at 8:49am<br /><br />In which case, you may wish to correct the remaining typo in the Naming Convention PDF: <div></div><strong>CAPPC</strong> instead of <strong>CAPCP</strong><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6427.html#6427</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor :  Because the &amp;#034;M&amp;#034; (for...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6425.html#6425</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1578<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Feb 2015 at 7:31am<br /><br />Because the "<strong>M</strong>" (for the package type <strong>M</strong>olded Body) really should be at the end of the Footprint Name Prefix. <div>&nbsp;</div><div>Our goal is to correct flaws to improve the standard for the future. </div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6425.html#6425</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor : Some days before it was the other...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6424.html#6424</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=870">robmeyer</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1578<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Feb 2015 at 7:11am<br /><br />Some days before it was the other typo (CAPMP). Also in your pdf. In the downloadable fpx file the CAPMP is also used. And the POD also have this CAPMP naming. <br><br>So is the question why changing a naming convention that works for years?<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6424.html#6424</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor :    In the Molded Body calculator...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6423.html#6423</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1578<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Feb 2015 at 6:59am<br /><br /><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'>Inthe Molded Body calculator the auto-generated names are:<o:p></o:p></span></p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><ul><li><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'>The Polarized Diode is <strong>DIO<font color="#ff0000">M<o:p></o:p></font></strong></span></div></li><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><li><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'>The Non-polarized Diode is <strong>DION<font color="#ff0000">M<o:p></o:p></font></strong></span></div></li><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><li><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'>The Polarized Capacitor is <strong>CAPP<font color="#ff0000">M<o:p></o:p></font></strong></span></div></li><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><li><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'>The Non-polarized Capacitor is<strong> CAP<font color="#ff0000">M<o:p></o:p></font></strong></span></div></li></ul><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""></p><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"="">Notethat the prefix always ends in <strong>M </strong>for molded body.</p><div></div><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""><o:p>Here is the link to download the standard (which had a typo) - <a href="http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-sm-footprint-naming-c&#111;nventi&#111;n_topic479.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc7351-sm-footprint-naming-convention_topic479.html</a>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""><o:p></o:p>&nbsp;</p></span><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" ="ms&#111;normal"=""></p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 06:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6423.html#6423</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Naming Convention On The Molded Capacitor : Hi,When I build a Polarized Molded...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6410.html#6410</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=870">robmeyer</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1578<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Feb 2015 at 4:28am<br /><br />Hi,<br>&nbsp;<br>When I build a Polarized Molded Capacitor the naming of the Footprint is wrong. In 2015.08 it is <strong>CAPPM</strong>. <div>&nbsp;</div>From the naming convention it should be <strong>CAPMP</strong>.<br><br>Robert<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 04:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-on-the-molded-capacitor_topic1578_post6410.html#6410</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>