<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Concave Modules</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Concave Modules]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 02:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1364</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : Tom,For a boat load of modules...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5454.html#5454</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=165">Randy Clemmons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19 Jun 2014 at 9:19am<br /><br />Tom,<div><br></div><div>For a boat load of modules / datasheets, go to Digi-key and search on 'Modules', scroll down to RF/IF and RFID.</div><div><br></div><div>You should find few hundred to choose from.</div><div><br></div><div>Randy</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5454.html#5454</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules :  Hi Tom,Correct, there is no...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5453.html#5453</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=165">Randy Clemmons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19 Jun 2014 at 9:14am<br /><br /><div>Hi Tom,</div><div><br></div><div>Correct, there is no recommended land pattern, only a mechanical dwg on sheet 29 at this link:</div><div><a href="http://www4.telit.com/module/infopool/download.php?id=7522" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www4.telit.com/module/infopool/download.php?id=7522</a></div><div><br></div><div>No&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.4;">recommended land pattern is why I was keen on using the Library Expert to create the part from the component's mech dwg.</span></div><div><span style="line-height: 1.4;"><br></span></div><div>I can dig up some suggested land patterns for other modules if your trying to determine a good solution for castellated modules in general.</div><div><br></div><div>Randy</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5453.html#5453</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : There is no mfr. recommended footprint...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5452.html#5452</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19 Jun 2014 at 8:58am<br /><br /><p>There is no mfr. recommended footprint for this 2-Sided LCC Module - </p><p><a href="http://www.telit.com/telit/Pulsar/en_US.Store.display.1103./jupiter-sl871" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.telit.com/telit/Pulsar/en_US.Store.display.1103./jupiter-sl871</a>&nbsp;</p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5452.html#5452</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : Sounds good. I think most module...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5451.html#5451</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=53">jameshead</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19 Jun 2014 at 8:55am<br /><br />Sounds good.&nbsp; I think most module manufacturers provide a recommended footprint layout anyway.&nbsp; Certainly all the ones that we use have done this and it was only Randy's thread that piqued my interest here.<br><br>We usually end up doing a small daughter board to host the module on with our own connector on to make switching between different manufacturers' modules easier without changing the main boards of our products.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5451.html#5451</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : Hello Tom,Your proposed LCC scheme...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5450.html#5450</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=165">Randy Clemmons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19 Jun 2014 at 8:26am<br /><br />Hello Tom,<div><br></div><div>Your proposed LCC scheme will work fine for my needs.</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5450.html#5450</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : TheIPC Castellated Lead package...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5449.html#5449</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19 Jun 2014 at 8:16am<br /><br />The&nbsp;IPC Castellated Lead package is LCC. But LCC has 4 sides. <p>So we're going to add a new component family called LCC 2-sided. </p><p>In V2014.05 there will be - </p><ul><li>LCC 4-Sided</li><li>LCC 2-Sided</li></ul><p>Then we don't need to define every component family that falls into this category and the "Physical Description" will differentiate between 2 &amp; 4 sided versions. </p><p>I hope this is satisfactory to the users because we're doing this without&nbsp;approval from IPC.&nbsp;</p><p>However, I will discuss this new 2-Sided LCC issue&nbsp;next month&nbsp;when the IPC-7351 Land Pattern committee leaders meet at IPC headquarters in Bannockburn, IL to review the status of adding through-hole technology to the standard as well as Drafting Outline and Polarity Marking guidelines for the "C" revision. </p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5449.html#5449</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : We use a few of these types of...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5445.html#5445</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=53">jameshead</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19 Jun 2014 at 12:36am<br /><br />We use a few of these types of modules as well for different functions: GPS, wireless, fieldbus.<br><br>I suspect the list would be endless as the companies providing these type of modules can dream up new functions and it's something I've looked at doing something similar here.<br><br>I'd be happy with a calculator for a "standard" family but leave the naming to be a little more generic with Manufacturer_Manufacturer's-Part-Number.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5445.html#5445</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules :  We need help in defining the...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5444.html#5444</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Jun 2014 at 6:11pm<br /><br /><p>We need help in defining the various "Component Families" that fall into this group "<strong>Castellated Leads, </strong><strong>2 Sided</strong>". </p><p>So far we have "<strong>GPS</strong>" and we're not sure if that's a component family. </p><p>Any others that we can add to the drop-down menu bar?</p><p>Trying to keep things Standardized but it's getting difficult with today's technology. </p><p><br></p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5444.html#5444</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : cool !Thank you ]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5443.html#5443</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=165">Randy Clemmons</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Jun 2014 at 3:30pm<br /><br /><div>cool !</div><div><br></div><div><span style="line-height: 1.4;">Thank you</span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5443.html#5443</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Concave Modules : We decided to add a new component...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5442.html#5442</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1364<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Jun 2014 at 3:27pm<br /><br /><p>We decided to add a new component family for the .05 release called "<strong>Castellated Leads, </strong><strong>2 Sided</strong>" and allow the user to enter as many pins as needed. </p><p>The Side Concave Chip Array was intended for Resistor Networks (not GPS Modules). </p><p><br></p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/concave-modules_topic1364_post5442.html#5442</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>