<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Why is Gang Mask shape option removed?</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Why is Gang Mask shape option removed?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3452</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : We fixed the rounding issue for...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13740.html#13740</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 10 Jan 2025 at 11:44am<br /><br />We fixed the rounding issue for calculating Gang Solder Mask.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>The Gang Mask code was written so the Minimum Pad to Pad had to be greater than the value entered. Adding 0.001 to the Minimum Pad to Pad worked. But now it works with the actual value (not greater than the value).&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>We also added a new Forum post regarding this subject:</div><div><a href="https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/minimum-solder-mask-web-gang-mask_topic3455.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/minimum-solder-mask-web-gang-mask_topic3455.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>The V25.03 Footprint Expert pre-release will be available next week.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you for reporting this issue.</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13740.html#13740</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : More information regarding the...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13733.html#13733</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 07 Jan 2025 at 4:41pm<br /><br />More information regarding the Nominal Calculation Mode:&nbsp;<div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/footprint-expert-nominal-dimensi&#111;n-calculator_topic3450.html?FID=1&amp;PR=3" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/footprint-expert-nominal-dimension-calculator_topic3450.html?FID=1&amp;PR=3</a></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 16:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13733.html#13733</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : Thanks. All good now... ]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13732.html#13732</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16854">ulissescastro</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 07 Jan 2025 at 4:34pm<br /><br />Thanks. All good now...]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 16:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13732.html#13732</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : I was able to reproduce the issue...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13726.html#13726</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Jan 2025 at 4:55pm<br /><br />I was able to reproduce the issue using 4 place calculations.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>When I use 3 places it works OK. But that's because when 4 places are rounded to 3 places, the rounding is up.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Try this - use 4 places and for the Minimum Pad to Pad Spacing use 0.2033.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>The new FED Vol 18 Nominal Calculation Mode comes with V25.02 Footprint Expert.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Switch between Min/Max and Nominal Mode in "Tools &gt; Options &gt; File &gt; Calculation Mode &gt; Min/Max or Nominal".&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>The new feature is located in the "Help &gt; User Guide &gt; Option Settings &gt; Calculation Mode Options".&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/Calculati&#111;n_Modes.png" height="700" width="916" border="0" /><br></div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13726.html#13726</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : I think the problem is in the...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13725.html#13725</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16854">ulissescastro</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Jan 2025 at 4:34pm<br /><br />I think the problem is in the resolution and how many decimal points are used, please try to use at least 4 or 5 decimal points in your preferences. I do know is not realistic but please give it a try... Found the Fix, Thanks for helping...&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>by the way thanks for sharing the&nbsp;<b style=": rgb251, 251, 253;">FED Vol 18 standard,&nbsp;</b>for some reason I did came up to the same conclusions over the time... are you planning to give a quick update and presentation about it?&nbsp;I'm not sure if we can buy it or what its include on it. so a quick summary may help to justify it ;)</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 16:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13725.html#13725</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : I entered all your dimensions...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13724.html#13724</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Jan 2025 at 4:12pm<br /><br />I entered all your dimensions and concluded the same result.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Footprint Expert is trimming the pads per the SMD Pad Stack Rules and turns off the Gang Mask feature.&nbsp;<br><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/QFN_With_Pad_Trimming.png" height="700" width="882" border="0" /><br></div><div>&nbsp;</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 16:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13724.html#13724</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : Fix it. it looks like the comparison...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13723.html#13723</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16854">ulissescastro</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Jan 2025 at 4:00pm<br /><br />Fix it. it looks like the comparison should be &gt;= instead or &gt;... did a test and added 1 mil to the pad to pad and now it trims the leads and with no more gang mask...]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13723.html#13723</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : Hi Tom,it looks to me that the...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13722.html#13722</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16854">ulissescastro</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Jan 2025 at 3:51pm<br /><br /><p>Hi Tom,&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>it looks to me that the gang feature is added before FPE compute the trimming..</p><p><br></p><p>Please try to replicate the following and these are my&nbsp;settings..</p><p><br></p><p><a href="uploads/16854/FP.PNG" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">uploads/16854/FP.PNG</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<br></p><p><a href="uploads/16854/FPX.PNG" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">uploads/16854/FPX.PNG</a><br></p><p><a href="uploads/16854/Opti&#111;ns.PNG" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">uploads/16854/Options.PNG</a><br></p><p><br></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 15:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13722.html#13722</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : You do not need to do 1:1 scale...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13721.html#13721</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Jan 2025 at 2:40pm<br /><br />You do not need to do 1:1 scale solder mask if you set the Minimum Pad to Pad Spacing to allow for a solder mask web.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>What Solder Mask annular swell do you use? 0.05, 0.07 or 0.10?&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>What is your Minimum Solder Mask Web? 0.07, 0.08 0.09 or 0.10?&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Multiply the Solder Mask annular swell by 2 and add the Minimum Solder Mask Web.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Then use that value to set your Minimum Pad to Pad Spacing rule.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>This will effectively turn off the Gang Mask feature.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 14:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13721.html#13721</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why is Gang Mask shape option removed? : I usually don&amp;#039;t use the Altium...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13720.html#13720</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16854">ulissescastro</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3452<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 Jan 2025 at 2:31pm<br /><br />I usually don't use the Altium solder mask Rule. in most cases it's useless. I do prefer to define the mask what Altium called "Manual" in my Footprints.<div><br></div><div>I do trust more in FPE than Altium, if the only solution now is to do 1:1 in FPE and then control it in the CAD tool, I do think this is going backwards, you should bring the option back.<br><div><br></div><div>What you describe at the end is what I was mentioning defining the pad to pad clearance.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>My question again is. Where can this feature be turned on or off or what is the value that will trigger FPE to to add the shape or not. is it the trimming of leads in your code preceding the mask feature or is it after?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 14:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/why-is-gang-mask-shape-option-removed_topic3452_post13720.html#13720</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>