<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : DPAK with 9 pins?</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : DPAK with 9 pins?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 08:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3118</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[DPAK with 9 pins? : We added more pin configurations...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12420.html#12420</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3118<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 May 2022 at 8:18am<br /><br />We added more pin configurations to the DPAK package.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Note: we count the Thermal Pad as a pin, so to create a 9-terminal DPAK you would use the 10-pin option.</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 08:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12420.html#12420</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[DPAK with 9 pins? : Infineon&amp;#039;s Paste Mask recommendation...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12417.html#12417</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3118<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03 May 2022 at 8:57am<br /><br />Infineon's Paste Mask recommendation follows the irregular shape of the Thermal Pad.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>That's the number 1 problem with IPC. They do not have any guidelines for irregular shaped terminal leads. They only provide data when the Terminal Leads are symmetrical.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 08:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12417.html#12417</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[DPAK with 9 pins? : OK Tom.I had similar problem earlier...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12415.html#12415</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2560">BennsPCB</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3118<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02 May 2022 at 10:23pm<br /><br /><div>OK Tom.</div><div><br></div><div>I had similar problem earlier with 7 pin DPAK and that I built in my ECAD tool, but our Library Expert Professional should never restrict us building footprints. This tool should be ahead of trends.</div><div><br></div><div>Is there anything that says that IPC "std"-shape for paste mask won't work?<br></div><div>Infineon's recommended paste pattern, as I see it, is just a recommendation.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,...</div><div>/Benn<br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 22:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12415.html#12415</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[DPAK with 9 pins? : If a calculator part cannot be...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12414.html#12414</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3118<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 01 May 2022 at 3:33pm<br /><br /><div>If a calculator part cannot be moved to FP Designer, the best alternative is to create that footprint from scratch in FP Designer. Or open up 2 copies of the program and get x/y coordinate data from the calculator and copy to FP Designer.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>There are a couple component families that cannot be moved to FP Designer:<div><ul><li>SMD - <b>CAPAE</b></li><li>SMD - <b>DPAK</b></li><li>PTH - <b>TO-92</b></li><li>PTH - <b>TO-220</b></li></ul><div><b><br></b></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 15:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12414.html#12414</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[DPAK with 9 pins? : Hi Tom,I thought we could move...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12413.html#12413</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16221">gvellet</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3118<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 01 May 2022 at 3:18pm<br /><br />Hi Tom,<div><br></div><div>I thought we could move any part from the calculator to the designer. Is there a reason why the DPAK cannot be moved in the designer? Are there other parts that have the same limitation?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12413.html#12413</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[DPAK with 9 pins? : The InfineonPG-HSOG-8-1 Case Code...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12412.html#12412</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3118<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29 Apr 2022 at 8:37am<br /><br />The Infineon&nbsp;<span style=": rgb251, 251, 253;">PG-HSOG-8-1 Case Code cannot be created in Footprint Expert due to the irregular shaped pattern in the paste mask stencil.&nbsp;</span><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/DPAK_With_Odd_Paste_Mask.png" height="569" width="889" border="0" /><br><div><span style=": rgb251, 251, 253;"><br></span></div><div><span style=": rgb251, 251, 253;">But we'll add a 9-pin version.&nbsp;</span></div></div><div><span style=": rgb251, 251, 253;"><br></span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12412.html#12412</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[DPAK with 9 pins? : I wonder how to build a 9 pin...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12411.html#12411</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2560">BennsPCB</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3118<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29 Apr 2022 at 1:32am<br /><br /><div>I wonder how to build a 9 pin DPAK like Infineons <span ="folder">PG-HSOG-8-1</span>?</div><div>The parameters are already entered in Surface Mount Calculator, but i cannot choose 9 pins.</div><div>In an earlier version of Lib Expert you could export to the Designer Calculator, but that seems to be removed in Enterprise Edition 2022.3</div><div>Cheers,...</div><div>/Benn<br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 01:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/dpak-with-9-pins_topic3118_post12411.html#12411</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>