<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Package Symbols versus Mechanical Symbols</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Allegro : Package Symbols versus Mechanical Symbols]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2518</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Package Symbols versus Mechanical Symbols :  Plated through mountingholes...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10610.html#10610</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11070">delovetsky</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2518<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 Feb 2020 at 7:07am<br /><br />Plated through mounting&nbsp;holes which are electrically connected need to be tested for.<div><br><div>This means it needs to reside with the net list for automated testing.</div><div><br></div><div>In Allegro a mechanical plated through hole will not allow a connection and would be voided within a shape.</div><div>&nbsp;</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10610.html#10610</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Package Symbols versus Mechanical Symbols : I&amp;#039;ve confirmed that Allegro...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10370.html#10370</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12829">tjnash75</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2518<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 Aug 2019 at 4:34pm<br /><br />I've confirmed that Allegro mechanical symbols don't allow electrical connections, so at the very least plated holes can't be mechanical symbols and connect to a net.&nbsp; How confusing...]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10370.html#10370</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Package Symbols versus Mechanical Symbols : I believe Allegro and OrCAD PCB...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10369.html#10369</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12829">tjnash75</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2518<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 Aug 2019 at 10:44am<br /><br />I believe Allegro and OrCAD PCB Designer both use psm and bsm files to delineate drawing types:<div><div align="justify" style="margin: 0px 0px 0.75em; line-height: 1.3em; caret-color: rgb51, 51, 51; color: rgb51, 51, 51; font-family: arial; font-size: 13px;"><div style="caret-color: rgb0, 0, 0; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; text-align: left; margin: 14pt 0pt 0pt 21pt; text-indent: -10pt; vertical-align: line;"><span style="font-weight: bold; vertical-align: line;">Package Symbol</span>&nbsp;(<span style="vertical-align: line;">.psm</span>): Used for footprints such as SOIC20, BGA, QFP, and so on.</div><div style="caret-color: rgb0, 0, 0; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; text-align: left; margin: 14pt 0pt 0pt 21pt; text-indent: -10pt; vertical-align: line;"><span style="text-indent: -10pt; font-weight: bold; vertical-align: line;">Mechanical Symbol</span><span style="text-indent: -10pt;">&nbsp;</span><span style="text-indent: -10pt;">(</span><span style="text-indent: -10pt; vertical-align: line;">.bsm</span><span style="text-indent: -10pt;">) : A generic card outline, mounting hole, tooling hole, board stiffener.</span></div><div style="caret-color: rgb0, 0, 0; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; text-align: left; margin: 14pt 0pt 0pt 21pt; text-indent: -10pt; vertical-align: line;"><a name="1146369"></a><span style="font-weight: bold; vertical-align: line;">Format Symbol</span>&nbsp;(<span style="vertical-align: line;">.osm</span>): A through D size page format, company logo, assembly/fab notes, cross section diagram, and so on.<br></div><div style="caret-color: rgb0, 0, 0; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; text-align: left; margin: 14pt 0pt 0pt 21pt; text-indent: -10pt; vertical-align: line;"><a name="1146370"></a><span style="font-weight: bold; vertical-align: line;">Shape Symbol</span>&nbsp;(<span style="vertical-align: line;">.ssm</span>): Creates a filled polygon (<span style="font-style: italic; vertical-align: line;">shape</span>) used for custom pads.<br></div><div style="caret-color: rgb0, 0, 0; color: rgb0, 0, 0; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; text-align: left; margin: 14pt 0pt 0pt 21pt; text-indent: -10pt; vertical-align: line;"><a name="1146371"></a><span style="font-weight: bold; vertical-align: line;">Flash Symbol</span>&nbsp;(<span style="vertical-align: line;">.fsm</span>): A symbol used to represent a thermal relief connection on a negative plane.</div></div><br ="apple-interchange-newline"="" style="font-family: -webkit-standard;"></div><div>I don't believe the dra file is any different, and that the psm/bsm file is a binary file only used during placement. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>I experimented and there's definitely a difference, as changing the file extension broke my ability to place the symbol. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>You raise any interesting point about electrical connectivity, though.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>I wonder if mechanical symbols (from the tool's perspective) can still have electrical connectivity defined. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>I would think that a mechanical stiffener (e.g. a wedge lock) would possibly fall into the same category as a plated through hole, in that respect.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10369.html#10369</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Package Symbols versus Mechanical Symbols : There are Plated Through Mounting...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10368.html#10368</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2518<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 Aug 2019 at 9:42am<br /><br />There are Plated Through Mounting Holes which are normally in the schematic tied to GND.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>There are Non-Plated Mounting Holes which are Mechanical.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>What's a .bsm file? Is that a Concept Symbol?</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10368.html#10368</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Package Symbols versus Mechanical Symbols : I&amp;#039;ve noticed when I create...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10367.html#10367</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12829">tjnash75</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2518<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 11 Aug 2019 at 7:35am<br /><br />I've noticed when I create items like mounting holes, they get created as package symbols as opposed to mechanical symbols.&nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, or if this is the default behavior of the tool.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>If this is the behavior of the tool, why are things like mounting holes getting created as package symbols (.psm) and not mechanical symbols (.bsm)?&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding the purpose of mechanical symbols?<div><br></div><div>Thanks in advance!</div><div>Tim</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2019 07:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/package-symbols-versus-mechanical-symbols_topic2518_post10367.html#10367</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>