<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Product Suggestions : Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2492</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density : I second this suggestion.I always...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post12204.html#12204</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16707">zentekfr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2492<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Feb 2022 at 2:11am<br /><br /><div>I second this suggestion.</div><div>I always generate L and M densities in the same file for further flexibility of my future designs.<br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post12204.html#12204</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density : I would prefer an option to generate...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post11654.html#11654</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16025">SquareBill</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2492<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 Jun 2021 at 3:48pm<br /><br />I would prefer an option to generate them into separate libraries. We use Concord and all of the footprints are their own elements that can be added to a component definition. I only ever use Nominal and Least, although I wouldn't care if M were generated along with the others.<br>Something I would like to see would be to import sub configs into the settings so that a Flex definition for instance could be&nbsp;simultaneously exported along with any or all of the IPC definitions.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post11654.html#11654</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density : Yes, I too would use such a feature...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10272.html#10272</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12519">JamesHeadOI</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2492<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 Jun 2019 at 11:57pm<br /><br /><div>Yes, I too would use such a feature though I wouldn't place it as a priority.</div><div>I always output all three, N, M and L at the same time and import into the same footprint library for Pulsonix to give me choice in designs.</div><div>I normally only use the N but in some portable instruments where space is tight I may make the decision to go down to L.</div><div>Generally I use M for those boards where there's a high likel hood that they are going to be hand-soldered as a prototype/development board or even a production board where only a handful are going to be required each year and it again is going to be hand-soldered.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 23:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10272.html#10272</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density : Yes, I would keep them in the...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10271.html#10271</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=246">LaserAlex</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2492<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 Jun 2019 at 9:21am<br /><br />Yes, I would keep them in the same library, with each schematic component pre-assigned to be able to use all three options.&nbsp; That is how Altium's on-demand library parts work and I like the effect.<div><br></div><div>I start the layout with the N part for most designs, or M for high-reliability.&nbsp; But if I find myself caught in board size constraints I can change parts down to L (or from M to N) in the schematic or board layout without needing to replace the schematic component with one from another library.</div><div><br></div><div>Of course you have more experience than a lot of us here, Tom, so if you suggest an alternate workflow I'd be happy to hear.<br><br><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 09:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10271.html#10271</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density : Would you mix L, N and M in the...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10270.html#10270</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2492<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 Jun 2019 at 8:18am<br /><br />Would you mix L, N and M in the same PCB library?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 08:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10270.html#10270</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Simultaneously generate L, N, and M density : I would love to see a checkbox...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10269.html#10269</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=246">LaserAlex</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2492<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03 Jun 2019 at 4:39pm<br /><br />I would love to see a checkbox in the export / script generation window that would generate all three footprint densities (Least, Nominal, Most) in a single output script.&nbsp; This would make it much easier to provide all three footprints at once when creating a new component into Altium Designer.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/simultaneously-generate-l-n-and-m-density_topic2492_post10269.html#10269</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>