<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Zero Component Orientation, Level A or B?</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Zero Component Orientation, Level A or B?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 08:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2442</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Zero Component Orientation, Level A or B? : Because IPC-SM-782, IEC 61188-7,...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/zero-component-orientation-level-a-or-b_topic2442_post10094.html#10094</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2442<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 07 Mar 2019 at 8:22am<br /><br />Because IPC-SM-782, IEC 61188-7, Valor VPL, EIA-481 and every other standard in the world uses Level B.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>IPC-7351 is the only guideline that uses Level A and they should have never choose that.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>I've been on the IPC Land Pattern committee since 1999 and we created the first IPC calculator and everything was Level B Orientation.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>We drafted IPC-7351 in 2004 and it was Level B.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>We had a meeting at IPC APEX in the winter of 2005 and the chairperson all of the sudden spoke up and wanted to introduce Level A and the attendees not knowing the past of the future voted in favor with her. It was the biggest mistake IPC ever made.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Then we has to change all the zero orientations in the software program and that took 3 months of coding and set everything behind schedule.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>So, the IPC-SM-782 that was released in 1987 and was the standard for 18 years had Level B Orientation. Why we accepted to change it was a huge mistake.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 08:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/zero-component-orientation-level-a-or-b_topic2442_post10094.html#10094</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Zero Component Orientation, Level A or B? : PCB Library Expert uses the &amp;#034;IEC...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/zero-component-orientation-level-a-or-b_topic2442_post10093.html#10093</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=13035">Batiskaff</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2442<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 07 Mar 2019 at 5:52am<br /><br />PCB Library Expert uses the "<b>IEC 61188-7 Level B</b>" zero component orientation.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Why not "Level A"?&nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>As I understand "Level B" will be more prefer in IPC-7351C ?<span><span><span><br></span></span></span></div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 05:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/zero-component-orientation-level-a-or-b_topic2442_post10093.html#10093</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>